Jumat, 30 September 2011
Dead Island
Kamis, 29 September 2011
Young Authors And Your Hair
I brought this up with Ciara Knight who runs an amazing blog, and yes, I am an odd duck that thinks of these things. Oh and I may have been influenced from having just watched Tangled as well (and the subliminal messages pushed by Disney).
Basically, I just want to know what's up? Why is long hair draping the heads of all of your books? Why do all of your female protagonists have long hair?
Exhibit A--Please turn your eyes to the anecdotal evidence I have gathered to support my hypothesis:
Now, I just want to dismiss the idea that I'm making a blanket generalization. I know that the percentage of young adult books that feature girls with long hair is not 100%. Ciara Knight has already told me in a comment that her protagonist has short hair. But the percentage is high. I'm going to say maybe 95%.
So what's up with hair? Why? One of my best friends is Meg. I asked her if I could post a picture of her and she agreed for this post that it would be okay. So here she is at left.
Notice how short her hair is. I think that Meg is a beautiful woman. So I guess my question is this. What kind of message are all of you young adult authors out there peddling in your book? Is it that young ladies need to have long hair? If so...why?
Is it beauty? Does having short hair make you less attractive to men? I for one have plenty of guy friends and they never point out a girl's hair as the thing they are attracted to. It's always the "rack" or "butt" or body type. So, am I just not getting something here?
Amanda Hocking goes really far with hair. Her book Switched has pages devoted to hair care products, she refers to her character's hair all the time, calls it an unmanageable frizz and a tangled mess and whatnot. She even says that her hair makes her ugly. Like WTF?! Really?
And then there's the young adult movie Tangled by Walt Disney. Rapunzel loses all of her magical power and becomes normal when her hair is cut. It also goes from sunny gold to dark brown. However, I still find the new Rapunzel attractive for a cartoon. But having her hair cut also freed her from the evil witch that dominated her life. So is this a message? If you cut your hair you lose your power but you also set yourself free.
So discuss please. Let me know your opinions on hair. I'm interested and want to know. And please tell me if you are writing a young adult novel with a protagonist that has short hair. I would like to know why you made that choice seeing as the market is awash with long-haired ladies.
Rabu, 28 September 2011
Error in your query? Don't sweat it. Agent and Big Six contract incoming
Recently, Suzie Townsend got very excited over a query sent to her by author Mindee Arnett. You can read it here. By very excited, I mean she took time away from a conference and from planning a trip to New Zealand to drop everything for it. That's pretty major, right? I want you to notice this line in particular from that query:
2. Have possession of as distinct from ownership.
And in Suzie's pitch that she sent to editors at the Big Six that she sold in 16-days to Tor Teen, she also had an error. You can read it here and I point out the error for you below:
Scratches head in puzzlement.
I'm not trying to throw eggs on Mindee's accomplishment. On the contrary, I congratulate her for being successful. And the same goes for super agent Suzie Townsend...congrats on her being so successful too.
No, what I'mbitching about discussing today is the lack of actual standards for this industry. It's all subjective. It depends on mood, lighting, whatever a person ate for breakfast, timing, what they had to drink, did they sleep well the night before, etc.
I think that for the unpublished, unknown author, the single greatest factor in publishing success is LUCK. Maybe as high as 50%. Think about that...your chance of publishing is at least 50% luck.
I just think that the advice given to authors about writing query letters should be more...I dunno... truthful. For one, spelling errors don't necessarily matter. If your query letter can get the point across and the agent reading it likes what you've written, then you'll be successful. Anyone that's written a query knows what a pain they are to write. A ton of work goes into them. Maybe if agents said, "Hey...you can follow the guidelines but really...to get our attention...you need to be lucky. Sorry...but the truth hurts."
Here's what I would have on my agency website if I were a literary agent. I'd have the usual stuff, query formats and whatnot withstanding, but right after the part that says, "Send us only your most polished query letter" would be the part that says, "And if you're LUCKY, you'll get my attention, and I'll get back to you." That would be honesty.
Random but related thought ==> If Suzie did care about spelling...maybe she actually thinks that "possess" is spelled "posses" and never called into question the quality of the book. I mean, I hear all the time from agents that "an error in your query gives us an impression of how your book is. One error there makes me wonder how chock full of them your manuscript may be. It's an instant form rejection!" So just imagine if the person reading your query thinks a word is spelled one way when in fact it is spelled another and they reject it thinking you didn't spell check. Wouldn't THAT be interesting?
And just for the record...I don't see content-wise why this offering from Mindee caught Suzie's eye. That's why I say she got lucky. It seems like a cross between Harry Potter with a wizard "school" via Chamber of Secrets (kids being killed) with that of other tropes like Being Human's ghost main character that watched her former boyfriend sleep and Piers Anthony's "Nightmare" (part of the Xanth series). I mean...I've read lots of "these types of queries" on my journeys through the blogosphere from people getting ready to send to agents that want help on their query letters.
I'm not saying it doesn't deserve to get published. It absolutely does. And absolutely deserves representation. But so do a dozen others that I can name off the top of my head that have queries very similar to this only without any errors, and these authors got nothing but rejections.
And you know what advice people out there give to these writers that are getting rejected. It's this: "Oh, your query must not be working. It must be bad. Revise and resend." Basically, they are told to go back to the drawing board, to re-edit, and revise, and send to new agents when they are ready. However, there is no scientific rock-solid proof that this is the case. I'm an atheist...I need proof to believe in things. There is no proof. It's simply conjecture...guessing. You know what I say? I say you got rejected because you just WEREN'T LUCKY. You got that? You have BAD frickin' luck? How do you like them apples? I don't suggest you go and buy a lotto ticket anytime soon. You'll probably lose at that too.
With regard to the query example...I don't see what caused the "OMG...I MUST DROP EVERYTHING NOW BECAUSE THIS IS AMAZING" moment. Especially given the spelling error. "Posses" is plural for "posse" which means a group of individuals. It's all...just...interesting.
That's my two cents for today. Invest in some four leaf clovers and some giraffe earrings of amazing juju. They shall serve you better than a spell check.
"Dusty learns that together she and Eli posses the rare ability to predict..."
pos·sessVerb/pəˈzes/
1. Have as belonging to one; own: "I do not possess a television set".
And in Suzie's pitch that she sent to editors at the Big Six that she sold in 16-days to Tor Teen, she also had an error. You can read it here and I point out the error for you below:
"Now the Dusty has to follow the clues..."Extra "the" there in case you don't see it.
Scratches head in puzzlement.
I'm not trying to throw eggs on Mindee's accomplishment. On the contrary, I congratulate her for being successful. And the same goes for super agent Suzie Townsend...congrats on her being so successful too.
No, what I'm
I think that for the unpublished, unknown author, the single greatest factor in publishing success is LUCK. Maybe as high as 50%. Think about that...your chance of publishing is at least 50% luck.
 |
| This should read "Avoid publishing unlucky authors. Throw half of the slush pile in the automatic rejection bin without reading them. What's left are the lucky ones. Thank God for the form rejection. Otherwise you might actually owe some of those people an actual response." |
Here's what I would have on my agency website if I were a literary agent. I'd have the usual stuff, query formats and whatnot withstanding, but right after the part that says, "Send us only your most polished query letter" would be the part that says, "And if you're LUCKY, you'll get my attention, and I'll get back to you." That would be honesty.
Random but related thought ==> If Suzie did care about spelling...maybe she actually thinks that "possess" is spelled "posses" and never called into question the quality of the book. I mean, I hear all the time from agents that "an error in your query gives us an impression of how your book is. One error there makes me wonder how chock full of them your manuscript may be. It's an instant form rejection!" So just imagine if the person reading your query thinks a word is spelled one way when in fact it is spelled another and they reject it thinking you didn't spell check. Wouldn't THAT be interesting?
And just for the record...I don't see content-wise why this offering from Mindee caught Suzie's eye. That's why I say she got lucky. It seems like a cross between Harry Potter with a wizard "school" via Chamber of Secrets (kids being killed) with that of other tropes like Being Human's ghost main character that watched her former boyfriend sleep and Piers Anthony's "Nightmare" (part of the Xanth series). I mean...I've read lots of "these types of queries" on my journeys through the blogosphere from people getting ready to send to agents that want help on their query letters.
I'm not saying it doesn't deserve to get published. It absolutely does. And absolutely deserves representation. But so do a dozen others that I can name off the top of my head that have queries very similar to this only without any errors, and these authors got nothing but rejections.
And you know what advice people out there give to these writers that are getting rejected. It's this: "Oh, your query must not be working. It must be bad. Revise and resend." Basically, they are told to go back to the drawing board, to re-edit, and revise, and send to new agents when they are ready. However, there is no scientific rock-solid proof that this is the case. I'm an atheist...I need proof to believe in things. There is no proof. It's simply conjecture...guessing. You know what I say? I say you got rejected because you just WEREN'T LUCKY. You got that? You have BAD frickin' luck? How do you like them apples? I don't suggest you go and buy a lotto ticket anytime soon. You'll probably lose at that too.
With regard to the query example...I don't see what caused the "OMG...I MUST DROP EVERYTHING NOW BECAUSE THIS IS AMAZING" moment. Especially given the spelling error. "Posses" is plural for "posse" which means a group of individuals. It's all...just...interesting.
That's my two cents for today. Invest in some four leaf clovers and some giraffe earrings of amazing juju. They shall serve you better than a spell check.
Selasa, 27 September 2011
Terra Nova Was AWESOME
- The explanation that the colonists in the past are actually living in an alternate time stream to that of the future. That was kind of cool.
- The dinosaurs looked as good as the ones in Jurassic Park.
- Each character has their own stakes. The dad has his family at stake, Josh left his true love in the future and is feeling reckless, the doctor has a whole colony to take care of, and the kids are just trying to be kids in a world that wants to eat them. Kudos for the shot of the dinosaur gnawing on a kid's leg. That was awesome.
- The natural world is filled with tremendous beauty and I bet they showcase that all season.
- The world they left was the epitome of dystopian. People have to wear breath masks, there is no moon or stars...only pollution and overcrowding. The government forces families to have only two kids...overpopulation means extinction.
- The whole blend of high-tech weapons vs. dinosaurs is cool because the colony is so small. And just to add flavor, they threw in additional conflict with a rogue colony that broke off from the main one and is in control of the mineral mine.
- LOST style J.J. Abrams mystery with drawings on the rocks near the waterfalls left by the colony leader's son who is missing but some kind of mathematical genius that knows something about the future.
- They've kept religion out of it. It's a new society and thus far, I didn't see a church anywhere. I can't say that there isn't going to be one...but that was one of the things I hated about Battlestar Galactica. I just thought the religion aspect got way too heavy so that it dominated storylines. And they're headed that way in Falling Skies too.
- Great acting on the part of the colony leader played by the villain from the movie Avatar.
 |
| CLICK TO MAKE BIGGER--GREAT WALLPAPER FOR YOUR PC |
I think the funnest part of this show is just letting my imagination run wild with the characters. I mean...what would it be like to not have to work some 40-hour a week job for mediocre pay but instead be 85-million years in the past with other humans trying to build a future and forge a society? Imagine the primeval world that existed back then and how danger and adventure would be around every corner. Awesome cannot begin to describe how that would feel...and they capture it perfectly in this show.
I can't wait for next week. If you aren't watching Terra Nova and you love sci-fi...you really should do yourself a favor and watch. Seriously.
Senin, 26 September 2011
Seeking feedback from the obligated reader
In my opinion, reading is a natural thing. It is a natural process. A person who is not concerned with the politics of the actual publishing industry who simply wants a book to enjoy goes on an exploration. They make a selection based off of many factors...cover art, reviews, and word-of-mouth recommendations. Notice that I left out the word "obligation". I did this intentionally because I think an obligated reader makes the act of reading a chore. However, that is exactly the kind of feedback many authors seek out when working on a manuscript.
I think that an obligated reader is the worst kind of reader. An obligated reader is irate...similar to the irateness one feels when obligated to attend an event that they don't want to go to. They need to fulfill an obligation because it has been assigned to them. They are an editor, an agent, or the friend of an author who coerces them into reading their manuscript. Or, they are a fellow author who reads the work in the hope that the other person will take an interest in their writing. I also think that "give-a-way" critiques make for an obligation as well. There's a reason they are offering that service--it simply isn't out of the goodness of their own heart. But it could be as simple as more traffic and positive word-of-mouth. Still...an obligation it is and they really, truthfully, don't want to read your stuff but hide behind a smile and the thought (I'm going to get through this as quickly as possible).
So, if your only choice for feedback is twisting the arm of someone who ordinarily wouldn't do so, how then is this going to affect your manuscript? Quite a bit actually.
The irate reader is going to insist on being hooked right off the bat (depending of course on the level of obligation). "You'd better hook me in the first sentence, the first paragraph, or the first page or we are done!"
They will be brimming with all the tools from their MFA classes, red pen handy. They will slash at your adverbs (ignoring the fact that authors like J.K. Rowling are awash with them and make millions if not billions of dollars). They will pound things like show don't tell, they will grab their soapbox and nitpick your story to DEATH.
The irate reader is the WORST reader on the planet. And really...I think any feedback you get from an irate reader is almost worthless. You'd be better off just hiring an editor to help you get your manuscript in shape for whatever it is that you intend to do with it. At least then, the person isn't irate with you and out for vengeance for making them do "work".
Do you seek feedback from people that are obligated to read your writing?
If so...have you been happy with the result?
Have you been an obligated reader for someone else?
If so...how did that turn out?
With my own writing, I have an editor and that's it. I decided never to seek feedback from anyone that I had to obligate to read my work. The only "obligated" readers I've had were agents that requested pages and those were all rejections. As a parting "monday" thought, I find it interesting that the gateway to publishing must go through readers who are irritated because they are FORCED to read in order to buy the latest spring fashions and pay for spa appointments. I guess that's why it's called "work".
I think that an obligated reader is the worst kind of reader. An obligated reader is irate...similar to the irateness one feels when obligated to attend an event that they don't want to go to. They need to fulfill an obligation because it has been assigned to them. They are an editor, an agent, or the friend of an author who coerces them into reading their manuscript. Or, they are a fellow author who reads the work in the hope that the other person will take an interest in their writing. I also think that "give-a-way" critiques make for an obligation as well. There's a reason they are offering that service--it simply isn't out of the goodness of their own heart. But it could be as simple as more traffic and positive word-of-mouth. Still...an obligation it is and they really, truthfully, don't want to read your stuff but hide behind a smile and the thought (I'm going to get through this as quickly as possible).
So, if your only choice for feedback is twisting the arm of someone who ordinarily wouldn't do so, how then is this going to affect your manuscript? Quite a bit actually.
The irate reader is going to insist on being hooked right off the bat (depending of course on the level of obligation). "You'd better hook me in the first sentence, the first paragraph, or the first page or we are done!"
They will be brimming with all the tools from their MFA classes, red pen handy. They will slash at your adverbs (ignoring the fact that authors like J.K. Rowling are awash with them and make millions if not billions of dollars). They will pound things like show don't tell, they will grab their soapbox and nitpick your story to DEATH.
The irate reader is the WORST reader on the planet. And really...I think any feedback you get from an irate reader is almost worthless. You'd be better off just hiring an editor to help you get your manuscript in shape for whatever it is that you intend to do with it. At least then, the person isn't irate with you and out for vengeance for making them do "work".
Do you seek feedback from people that are obligated to read your writing?
If so...have you been happy with the result?
Have you been an obligated reader for someone else?
If so...how did that turn out?
With my own writing, I have an editor and that's it. I decided never to seek feedback from anyone that I had to obligate to read my work. The only "obligated" readers I've had were agents that requested pages and those were all rejections. As a parting "monday" thought, I find it interesting that the gateway to publishing must go through readers who are irritated because they are FORCED to read in order to buy the latest spring fashions and pay for spa appointments. I guess that's why it's called "work".
Jumat, 23 September 2011
A Fairy Tale For Straight Men
The princess said "Hell no" and the prince lived happily ever after.
He rode motorcycles and f*cked skinny big-titted broads
and hunted and raced cars and went to naked bars
and dated women half his age and drank whiskey, beer,
and Captain Morgan....
The prince never heard bitching and never paid child support or alimony
and ate p*ssies and ass-f*cked cheerleaders and kept his house
and guns and never got cheated on while he was at work
and all his friends and family thought he was f*cking cool as hell
and he had tons of money in the bank
and he never read books because he was sexy as all get
and there just wasn't time for any of that
and in the end, he left the toilet seat up.
His name was George Clooney
See...fairy tales aren't just for women and kids. Men have them too. Have a great weekend.
Kamis, 22 September 2011
The Copycats Of Fiction Have No Shame And Make Millions
When Terry Brooks published The Sword of Shannara, I was one of the first kids to dive straight into it. And even at that early age (I was in junior high school at the time) I remember being shocked at how much it followed Tolkien's Lord of the Rings point-by-point. In LOTR you had the nine ringwraiths...in Brooks you had the nine skullbearers, in LOTR you had Sauron, in Brooks you had the Warlock Lord, and it goes on and on. The King of the Silver River is Elrond, the Hall of Kings is Moria complete with monster at the gate, and the druids are simply the Istari wizards. The Druids Keep is Isengard and Allanon is Gandalf, etc. You even have two hobbits...only they aren't called hobbits but they are from Shady Vale...a place a lot like Hobbiton. And their names are Flint and Shea instead of Frodo and Sam. Anyway...this is a well documented thing...the fact that a New York Times bestselling author blatantly stole from the grandfather of all epic fantasy and in the end...no one gave a shit. And to Brooks' credit, it didn't stop me from reading his books. I was hungry for fantasy at the time so I bought all the Shannara books as they came out and they steadily got better and better (and more original). I thought Elfstones of Shannara was awesome so yeah...he forged himself a great writing career. However, just out of the gate (so to speak) I thought things were so shameless with his first book that I would have been downright embarrassed had anyone called me on it.
Anyway, this is happening again in a book I'm reading. What book you ask? It's Amanda Hocking's Trylle trilogy and the first book is called Switched. Don't get me wrong...Amanda is a wonderful writer. I enjoy her prose but the woman doesn't have a story. No, she has Stephanie Meyer's story. Things started smacking me over the head about Chapter Six. Let me see if you can pick what book she is following point-by-point as I lay them out for you.
We are introduced to the female protagonist named Wendy. She considers herself unattractive, her hair is awful, and she has no friends. She's the new girl in a high school in a small town and awkward as hell. One day, a gorgeous boy starts staring at her and continues to do so until it makes her so uncomfortable she can't stand it. When she asks him about it...he is evasive...won't give her a straight answer. Only later on does she discover that he's a Trylle...the word for troll...and that he has essentially super powers. And he's very long-lived. Oh and he visits her in her bedroom at night...does this scene sound familiar?
One night outside her home, her life is threatened. Not with a careening car but setup almost the same. Two people attack her and "Finn" the hot dude saves her all by himself (pushing the bad people away). Then he takes her to his home which is absolutely gorgeous to meet his family of other trolls who are Gucci and Prada wearing, sushi-eating, upper class snobs. I mean super rich. Like millionaire rich (high society). And it's secluded in the woods (think evergreen forests) with a view of the Mississippi River... Instead of a black Volvo we have a black Porsche. She also finds out that there's something inherent in her that makes Finn stare at her. He can smell her. It's her hair (not blood) and it's irresistible to other Trylle.
That's all the farther I've gotten...but does that sound familiar to you? Does that point-by-point sound like a certain highly successful New York Times bestseller?
I know that some of you writers out there always say, "There are no original ideas." But COME ON! for Pete's sake!?
I mean, is there any shame to this? Here...let me give you an example of what I mean...
Hey author friends! Here's my AMAZING plot for my story...OMG...IT'S SO GOOD AND I WILL MAKE MILLIONS. I even have cover art for it already made...check it out:
Dude from a future where mankind is pushed to extinction by machines escapes through a portal into the past. He's on a mission to save a woman targeted by the machines of the future. He has to stop a killer robot only, along the way, he falls in love with the woman and they have sex and she gets pregnant. Here's the hitch...her baby will someday be this guy's father.
Holy shit! Isn't that great?! I iz so smart this is sure to be a bestseller and you all will be jealous while I'm making millions.
Anyway...what do you guys think? Amanda's books are huge bestsellers (maybe not as big as Twilight) but they've made her rich. Terry Brooks is a rich fat cat too and he blatantly copied Tolkien. I'm wondering why someone isn't blatantly copying J.K. Rowling. I mean you could do it and self-pub and probably catch a portion of the same audience that J.K. has. Even at 1% that's 4 million people that are going to buy your books. How would you like to sell 4 million books?
Oh ummm...here's my story...there's this paranormal school that teacheswizards ghosts, vamps, werewolf kids how to properly use their powers. Each one has a wand fetish like a silver bullet or locket that they channel their magic through. There are professors in the school. One paranormal boy named Charles Hatter is the only kid that survived when dark wizards ghosts, vamps, and werewolves led by Voldemort a real powerful dude attacked the family and left a mark on his forehead eyes (his eyes have flickering lightning bolts in the irises).
And to any of you that would say "You can get sued for this kind of copycat behavior"...I don't think that you can. Maybe Mr. Pagel can weigh in on this because he's a lawyer. But I'm pretty sure that ideas cannot be copyrighted...meaning a general idea...like a plot.
Anyway...authors that do this have no shame. I'm actually kind of disgusted. But they are richer than me and have huge publishing contracts so does what I think really matter? Nope.
How the hell did publishing get to be so terrible? Is it money? Are people so hard up to make a buck that they clone what other writers come up with and pass it off as their own story? Does it ever occur to people that if they are just blatantly going to steal a novel point-for-point, chapter-by-chapter and just change names and setting that...I dunno...maybe the world doesn't need another book like this? I guess I'm old school. Writing isn't just about writing for me. It's storytelling. And please don't tell me a story I've already heard. I don't want to read George R.R. Martin's story as told by John Doe with all the names changed and have to put up with all the praise you get lauded because the idiots out there who read books aren't well read enough to know that a story is a ripoff.
Anyway, this is happening again in a book I'm reading. What book you ask? It's Amanda Hocking's Trylle trilogy and the first book is called Switched. Don't get me wrong...Amanda is a wonderful writer. I enjoy her prose but the woman doesn't have a story. No, she has Stephanie Meyer's story. Things started smacking me over the head about Chapter Six. Let me see if you can pick what book she is following point-by-point as I lay them out for you.
 |
| These two books are essentially the same story. Only names have been changed. |
One night outside her home, her life is threatened. Not with a careening car but setup almost the same. Two people attack her and "Finn" the hot dude saves her all by himself (pushing the bad people away). Then he takes her to his home which is absolutely gorgeous to meet his family of other trolls who are Gucci and Prada wearing, sushi-eating, upper class snobs. I mean super rich. Like millionaire rich (high society). And it's secluded in the woods (think evergreen forests) with a view of the Mississippi River... Instead of a black Volvo we have a black Porsche. She also finds out that there's something inherent in her that makes Finn stare at her. He can smell her. It's her hair (not blood) and it's irresistible to other Trylle.
That's all the farther I've gotten...but does that sound familiar to you? Does that point-by-point sound like a certain highly successful New York Times bestseller?
I know that some of you writers out there always say, "There are no original ideas." But COME ON! for Pete's sake!?
I mean, is there any shame to this? Here...let me give you an example of what I mean...
Hey author friends! Here's my AMAZING plot for my story...OMG...IT'S SO GOOD AND I WILL MAKE MILLIONS. I even have cover art for it already made...check it out:
Dude from a future where mankind is pushed to extinction by machines escapes through a portal into the past. He's on a mission to save a woman targeted by the machines of the future. He has to stop a killer robot only, along the way, he falls in love with the woman and they have sex and she gets pregnant. Here's the hitch...her baby will someday be this guy's father.
Holy shit! Isn't that great?! I iz so smart this is sure to be a bestseller and you all will be jealous while I'm making millions.
Anyway...what do you guys think? Amanda's books are huge bestsellers (maybe not as big as Twilight) but they've made her rich. Terry Brooks is a rich fat cat too and he blatantly copied Tolkien. I'm wondering why someone isn't blatantly copying J.K. Rowling. I mean you could do it and self-pub and probably catch a portion of the same audience that J.K. has. Even at 1% that's 4 million people that are going to buy your books. How would you like to sell 4 million books?
Oh ummm...here's my story...there's this paranormal school that teaches
And to any of you that would say "You can get sued for this kind of copycat behavior"...I don't think that you can. Maybe Mr. Pagel can weigh in on this because he's a lawyer. But I'm pretty sure that ideas cannot be copyrighted...meaning a general idea...like a plot.
Anyway...authors that do this have no shame. I'm actually kind of disgusted. But they are richer than me and have huge publishing contracts so does what I think really matter? Nope.
How the hell did publishing get to be so terrible? Is it money? Are people so hard up to make a buck that they clone what other writers come up with and pass it off as their own story? Does it ever occur to people that if they are just blatantly going to steal a novel point-for-point, chapter-by-chapter and just change names and setting that...I dunno...maybe the world doesn't need another book like this? I guess I'm old school. Writing isn't just about writing for me. It's storytelling. And please don't tell me a story I've already heard. I don't want to read George R.R. Martin's story as told by John Doe with all the names changed and have to put up with all the praise you get lauded because the idiots out there who read books aren't well read enough to know that a story is a ripoff.
Langganan:
Postingan (Atom)
